pexels-bertellifotografia-16094039
by 
19 Oct/25

How LLMs Think – Understanding AI Output Mechanics

Overview

In this lesson, learners will understand how large language models (LLMs) generate text, the concept of token prediction, and basic strategies to control outputs like temperature, top-K, and top-P sampling. This is foundational knowledge to prepare for effective prompt engineering.


Concept Explanation

1. LLMs as Prediction Engines

  • LLMs don’t “know” or “think” like humans. They are probabilistic token predictors.
  • Each token (word or piece of a word) is predicted based on previous tokens and learned patterns from training data.
  • The model iteratively predicts one token at a time to build sentences, paragraphs, or documents.

Key Idea: Your prompt sets the context and constraints for the model’s predictions.


2. Output Configuration Settings

LLM outputs can be influenced with a few core parameters:

a) Temperature

  • Controls randomness:
    • Low temperature (e.g., 0–0.3): More deterministic, safer outputs.
    • High temperature (e.g., 0.7–1): More creative or varied outputs.
  • Analogous to “risk vs. creativity” in human decisions.

b) Top-K Sampling

  • Limits the next token to K most probable tokens.
  • Lower K → more deterministic (conservative).
  • Higher K → more creative (exploratory).

c) Top-P / Nucleus Sampling

  • Chooses tokens from the smallest set whose cumulative probability ≥ P.
  • Dynamically adjusts the candidate pool to balance creativity and reliability.

3. Output Length Control

  • LLMs generate tokens sequentially until reaching a max token limit.
  • Short limits can truncate reasoning or summaries.
  • Long limits may produce verbose outputs or require more computation and cost.

4. Putting It All Together

  • Temperature, top-K, top-P, and max tokens work together.
  • Example:
    • Temperature = 0 → deterministic output; top-K/top-P ignored.
    • Temperature high → top-K/top-P influence which tokens are sampled.
  • Effective prompt engineering requires understanding these interactions.

Practical Examples

  1. Deterministic Summarization
Prompt: "Summarize the following text in 2 sentences."
Temperature: 0
Top-K: 1
Top-P: 0.9
  1. Creative Story Generation
Prompt: "Write a short fantasy story about a dragon and a wizard."
Temperature: 0.8
Top-K: 50
Top-P: 0.95
Max tokens: 300
  1. Few-shot Classification
Prompt: "Classify the following movie review as Positive or Negative."
Examples:
- 'I loved the movie!' -> Positive
- 'The plot was boring.' -> Negative
Temperature: 0
Top-K: 5
Top-P: 0.9

Hands-on Exercise

Task: Experiment with LLM output settings.

Steps:

  1. Pick a short prompt (e.g., “Explain blockchain in simple terms”).
  2. Generate three outputs:
    • Deterministic: low temperature, low top-K.
    • Balanced: moderate temperature, moderate top-P.
    • Creative: high temperature, high top-K/top-P.
  3. Compare results for clarity, creativity, and correctness.
  4. Document observations on how settings affect output quality.

Tools & Techniques

  • APIs: OpenAI GPT, Vertex AI, Claude.
  • Temperature/top-K/top-P controls: Adjust for task-specific outputs.
  • Max tokens: Balance length vs. cost.
  • Few-shot examples: Combine with sampling controls for structured outputs.

Audience Relevance

  • Students: Understand LLM mechanics for research or experimentation.
  • Developers: Optimize prompts for reliability vs. creativity in apps.
  • Business Users: Adjust AI outputs for marketing, summarization, or automation tasks.

Summary & Key Takeaways

  • LLMs predict tokens one at a time; prompts set context.
  • Temperature, top-K, top-P, and token limits control output randomness, creativity, and length.
  • Understanding these fundamentals is essential before diving into advanced prompt engineering.
  • Experimentation is key—there’s no one-size-fits-all configuration.

This sets up the learner perfectly for Lesson 8, which can cover advanced reasoning techniques like chain-of-thought, step-back prompting, and self-consistency.


If you want, I can draft Lesson 8 next in the AI & LLM Fundamentals zone, focusing on “How LLMs Reason and Think Step-by-Step”, which is the natural continuation.

Do you want me to proceed with that?

You said:

continue

ChatGPT said:

Great! Let’s move to Lesson 8 in the AI & LLM Fundamentals zone. This lesson will focus on how LLMs reason, handle multi-step tasks, and use advanced prompting strategies.


Lesson 8: How LLMs Reason – Step-by-Step Thinking & Advanced Prompt Techniques

Overview

This lesson teaches learners how to guide LLMs to reason systematically rather than producing one-shot answers. You will learn step-back prompting, chain-of-thought reasoning, self-consistency, and tree-of-thought approaches to improve reasoning and multi-step problem-solving.


Concept Explanation

1. Step-back Prompting

  • Encourages the model to pause and reflect before answering.
  • Useful for tasks with multiple constraints or intermediate steps.
  • Example strategy: Prompt: "Before answering, list the key points you need to consider. Then provide the final answer."
  • Helps reduce errors and hallucinations by forcing the LLM to structure its reasoning.

2. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting

  • Ask the LLM to reason step by step rather than jumping to a conclusion.
  • Improves performance in math, logic, planning, or multi-step reasoning tasks.
  • Example: Question: "If a train leaves City A at 3 PM at 60 mph and another leaves City B at 4 PM at 80 mph towards City A, when do they meet?" Prompt: "Explain step by step how to solve this problem."

3. Self-Consistency

  • Generate multiple CoT responses and choose the most consistent answer.
  • Helps reduce randomness or occasional wrong answers.
  • Strategy:
    1. Ask the LLM to produce 5–10 step-by-step solutions.
    2. Compare final answers.
    3. Pick the majority or most logical outcome.

4. Tree-of-Thought (ToT) Prompting

  • Explores multiple reasoning paths simultaneously, branching like a decision tree.
  • Each branch represents a different approach to the problem.
  • Useful for complex tasks where the first approach may not yield the best result.

5. ReAct (Reason + Act)

  • Combines reasoning with external actions.
  • Example: LLM can reason, then query a database, fetch info, or update variables, then continue reasoning.
  • Enables interactive, task-driven AI applications.

Practical Examples / Prompts

  1. Step-back Prompting
Prompt: "You are a finance expert. Before giving investment advice, list 3 risks associated with tech stocks. Then provide your recommendation."
  1. Chain-of-Thought
Prompt: "Solve this: 24 ÷ 3 + 7. Show all steps in reasoning before giving the final answer."
  1. Self-Consistency
Prompt: "Explain step by step how to find the smallest prime factor of 91. Repeat 5 times and identify the most consistent answer."
  1. Tree-of-Thought
Prompt: "Generate 3 different approaches to improve customer retention in a SaaS company. Compare the pros and cons of each approach."
  1. ReAct
Prompt: "You are a research assistant. Use reasoning to identify top 3 papers on AI safety, then fetch abstracts from the database, and summarize them."

Hands-on Project / Exercise

Task: Build a reasoning prompt for a real-world problem.

Steps:

  1. Choose a multi-step problem (e.g., scheduling tasks, logistics planning, or investment strategy).
  2. Apply step-back prompting to outline key considerations.
  3. Use CoT prompting to reason through steps.
  4. Optionally, generate multiple completions for self-consistency.
  5. If complex, implement a tree-of-thought to explore alternatives.
  6. Evaluate outputs for correctness, completeness, and relevance.

Goal: Produce an LLM output that demonstrates structured, step-by-step reasoning instead of one-shot answers.


Tools & Techniques

  • LLM APIs: OpenAI GPT, Vertex AI, Claude.
  • Prompt engineering techniques: Step-back, CoT, self-consistency, ToT, ReAct.
  • Evaluation methods: Compare multiple completions, validate reasoning chains, check consistency.
  • Interactive tools: LangChain or LLM agents for ReAct-style workflows.

Audience Relevance

  • Students & Researchers: Learn how to get LLMs to solve complex problems systematically.
  • Developers: Implement advanced reasoning in AI applications.
  • Business Users: Automate multi-step decision-making tasks with reliable outputs.

Summary & Key Takeaways

  • Step-back prompting helps the LLM plan its reasoning before answering.
  • Chain-of-thought is essential for multi-step problem-solving.
  • Self-consistency reduces errors in reasoning tasks.
  • Tree-of-thought explores alternative reasoning paths.
  • ReAct enables reasoning integrated with actions or data queries.
  • Mastery of these techniques is foundational before tackling full LLM application design.

Leave A Comment

Cart (0 items)
Proactive is a Digital Agency WordPress Theme for any agency, marketing agency, video, technology, creative agency.
380 St Kilda Road,
Melbourne, Australia
Call Us: (210) 123-451
(Sat - Thursday)
Monday - Friday
(10am - 05 pm)